Abstract
By saying “objétala” and by means of the imperative modality, Socrates demands from the interrogatory an argument against, that is to say, imperatively demands that the answer be an argument, which means that they answer him in declarative modality. In this article the different Socratic dialogic modalities are examined. It is then concluded about its importance and need.
References
Platón, “Teeteto”, Editorial Losada, Buenos Aires 2006, 1.
Descartes R, “Discurso del método”, Espasa Calpe, Madrid, 2010.
Hegel G. F, “Filosofía de la lógica y de la naturaleza”, Edit. Claridad, Buenos Aires 1974.
Fernández Fernández, J. Manuel; Ferreras, A.P, “La noción de campo en Kurt Lewin y Pierre Bourdieu: un análisis comparativo”, Rev Españ Investig Soc N°127, 07/09/, 2009, pp. 33-53(21).
Platón, “Filebos, Timeo,Critias” Gredos, Madrid 1992.
Martínez Oscar, “Platón, Protágoras, Gorgias, Menón”, Edaf, España 2007.
Platón, “La República”, Gradifico, Buenos Aires, 2016.
Nietzche F, “El viajero y su sombra”, Edaf, España 2011.
Samaja Juan, “Dialéctica de la investigación científica”, Helguero Editores, Argentina, 1987.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- Authors retain copyright.
- The authors give the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons Attribution license.
- This license allows third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal.
- Future publications should not be used for commercial purposes.
- The existence and specifications of this license must be mentioned.