The human condition as a subversive horizon in Latin American philosophies of education. | Dialektika: Journal of Philosophical Research and Social Theory
The human condition as a subversive horizon in Latin American philosophies of education.
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

human condition
education
autonomy
interculturality

Categories

How to Cite

Samé Iglesias, T. (2024). The human condition as a subversive horizon in Latin American philosophies of education. Dialektika: Journal of Philosophical Research and Social Theory, 6(16), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.51528/dk.vol6.id149

Abstract

Thinking education from Latin America emerges among the most relevant contemporary challenges in a world increasingly interdependent, complex and affected by a structural and systemic civilizational crisis. This places us before a requirement of perennial theoretical updating for the examination of the conditions, the how and the future of education and its unavoidable interrogation to the human condition: critical-formative axis of possibility and intersubjective and intercultural recognitions. To demonstrate the links of theoretical-civic-educational interiority in the Paulo Freire - Néstor García Canclini - Raúl Fornet-Betancourt triad and to interpret the formative functionality of the conceptual approaches on autonomy in the former, and interculturality in the latter, in the light of the human condition as a horizon of meanings, will be, for these reasons, objectives to be elucidated. In methodological terms, an examination of some of the relevant texts of these authors, the content analysis and the hermeneutic treatment of the bibliography are proposed. As a result of this examination, the ideas of autonomy and interculturality and their links make explicit their theoretical sustenance of holistic sense indicative of learning modes and socializing and inter-dynamic praxis. Anticipating conclusions should indicate this Latin American neohumanism as a theoretical enhancer of methodological, epistemic, ethical and emotional authenticity; and a referent of what we share in the recognition of our differences.

https://doi.org/10.51528/dk.vol6.id149
PDF (Español (España))

References

Cohan, W. (1996). Filosofía de la educación. Algunas perspectivas actuales. Departamento de Teoría y Fundamentos. Facultad de Educación. Universidad de Brasilia. Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca Aula, 8, 141-151.

García Canclini, N. (2001). Culturas híbridas. Estrategias para entrar y salir de la modernidad. Paidós.

García Canclini, N. (2004). Diferentes, desiguales y desconectados. Mapas de la interculturalidad. Editorial Gedisa.

García Canclini, N. (2019). Jóvenes y ciencias sociales: rediscutir el papel de las universidades. Revista Letral, (21), 48-64. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana de México.

García Canclini, N. (2021). ¿Qué será la interculturalidad? En Global Anthropological Dialogues, Dossier Anthropology on Latin America and the Caribbean today: New Theoretical and Methodological Challenges. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México. http://doi.org/10.1590/1809-43412021v18a801

Fornet Betancourt, R. (2007). Reflexiones de Raúl Fornet-Betancourt sobre el concepto de interculturalidad. Consorcio intercultural.

Fornet Betancourt, R. (2022). La interculturalidad a prueba. Disponible en: http://www.daneprairie.com. (12 de febrero).

Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogía del oprimido. Siglo XXI Editores.

Freire, P. (2010). Pedagogía de la autonomía y otros textos. Editorial Caminos.

Morin, E. (1995). Sobre la interdisciplinariedad. Revista Complejidad, (0).

Morin, E. (2011). La vía para el futuro de la humanidad. Espasa Libros.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Dra. Tania Samé Iglesias

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.