The Universal Concrete and the False Idea of a National Philosophy | Dialektika: Journal of Philosophical Research and Social Theory
The Universal Concrete and the False Idea of a National Philosophy
Portada Dialektika
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Freedom
Cuban Philosophy
Humberto Piñera Llera
Revista Cubana de Filosofía
Concrete universal

How to Cite

Gonzalez Arocha, J. (2019). The Universal Concrete and the False Idea of a National Philosophy: The Case of the Cuban Journal of Philosophy. Dialektika: Journal of Philosophical Research and Social Theory, 1(1), 22–30. Retrieved from https://journal.dialektika.org/ojs/index.php/logos/article/view/4

Abstract

Philosophy, from its geographical and ideological diversity, has almost always tried to answer a relatively finite set of questions: What is knowing? What is our relationship with the world? Does God exist? What is the relationship between the soul and the body? These have been, according to various authors, some of the questions that philosophical thinking must answer to be considered as such. However, in the face of this simplistic perspective, others with a more complex and speculative nature stand, such as the interpretation given by G.W.F. Hegel or in a different context offered by Alain Badiou. In both cases, we would be faced with proposals, not only insufficient but also contradictory in order to define an autochthonous philosophy. At the center of this debate is the Cuban Journal of Philosophy (Revista Cubana de Filosofía). Without wanting to determine what a Cuban philosophy is in general, here, we will deal with the moment of this journal to elucidate why it is insufficient and contradictory to define a Cuban Philosophy using the notion of concrete universal (Hegel) as the journal did. Finally, the article concludes with a critique of the idea of ​​Humberto Piñera Llera repeated by the Cuban philosopher Alexis Jardines.

PDF (Español (España))

References

Arocha, J. G. (2015). Sartre y la Revolución Cubana. Horizontes y Raíces, 2(2), 13.

Arocha, J. G. (2016). Jean-Paul Sartre y el debate ideológico sobre la Revolución cubana. TEMAS, No. 85-86, pp. 114-120. Recuperado de http://www.temas.cult.cu/sites/default/files/articulos_academicos_en_pdf/14%20Arocha.pdf.

Badiou A. Panorma de la filosofía francesa contemporánea (2006). Eikasia: Revista de Filosofía. Marzo; (3).

Hegel GWF. (1955). Lecciones sobre la Historia de la Filosofía. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Innerarity D. (1991). Libertad como pasión. Sobre la idea de Europa en Hegel. CORE. Recuperado de https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/83564543.pdf.

Jardines A. (2009). Kant en Kuba. La Habana: Editorial de Ciencias Sociales.

Piñera H. (1960) Panorama de la filosofía cubana. Washington D.C.: Unión Panamericana.

Revista Cubana de Filosofía (1946-1958). La Habana: Dirección Nacional de Cultura; Números 1-18.

Sáez Rueda L. (2012). Movimientos filosóficos actuales. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.

Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:

  • Authors retain copyright.
  • The authors give the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons Attribution license.
  • This license allows third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal.
  • Future publications should not be used for commercial purposes.
  • The existence and specifications of this license must be mentioned.
Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article published in this journal (e.g., include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they indicate that the work was published for the first time in this magazine.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.