Vol. 5 No. 12 (2023)
January-April

Articles

The “Rational Kernel” of Natural Teleology: Dialectical Interaction as the Concrete-Universal’s Form of Development

Published 21-01-2023

  • Rogney Piedra Arencibia

Rogney Piedra Arencibia
Queen’s University, Canadá

dialektika volumen 5, número 12

Abstract

It is often believed that the only alternative to an idealist conception of natural phenomena excludes both the presence of objective universal forms and their progression towards higher forms as the finality of processes in the natural world. Realism regarding the universal and teleological approaches regarding processes are signs of idealism. Therefore, materialism, it would seem, must conform to a nominalist and mechanical view of nature. However, an intelligent materialist reading of idealism’s classics reveals a more complex scenario. A real fact is expressed in a mystical fashion in idealism’s conceptions of objective universals and teleology. This article attempts to show such a real fact in its authentic (materialist) form. With that goal in mind, the present article discusses the notion of nature’s alienation, the distinction between abstract and concrete universals, and the concept of dialectical interaction. The natural-historical emergence of a higher form of matter’s organization assimilates, as its organs, the conditions that preceded it in time, transforming itself into an active producer of such conditions. That is the secret glimpsed but not correctly understood by idealism that a consistent materialist should not ignore.

Keywords

Dialectics, Teleology, Concrete Universal, Interaction

PDF

References

  1. Althusser, L. (2006). Philosophy of the Encounter. Later Writings, 1978-87. London: Verso.
  2. Anderson, P. (1989). Consideration on Western Marxism. London: Verso.
  3. Candland, D. (1993). Feral Children and Clever Animals: Reflections on Human Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. Cardona, J. A. (2015). Filosofía helenística. Estoicos, epicúreos, cínicos y escépticos. Madrid: Batiscafo.
  5. Clark, B., Foster, J. B., & York, R. (2007). The critique of intelligent design: Epicurus, Marx, Darwin, and Freud and the materialist defense of science. Theor Soc, 36(6).
  6. Cornford, F. M. (1966). Before and after Socrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Cornford, F. M. (1997). Plato's Cosmology. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
  8. Curd, P. (2019). Presocratic Philosophy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/presocratics/
  9. Engels, F. (1976). Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. In Marx and Engels Selected Works in Three Volumes (Vol. 3, pp. 93-151). Moscow: Progress Publisher.
  10. Engels, F. (1987). Dialectics of Nature. In K. Marx & F. Engels (Eds.), Collected Works (Vol. 25). New York: International Publishers.
  11. Engels, F. (1990). Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy. In K. Marx & F. Engels (Eds.), Collected Works (Vol. 26). New York: International Publishers.
  12. Grant, T., & Woods, A. (2003). Reason in Revolt. Dialectical Philosophy and Modern Science (Vol. 2). New York: Algora Publishing.
  13. Guthrie, W. K. C. (1978). A History of Greek Philosophy (Vol. V. The Later Plato and the Academy). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Guthrie, W. K. C. (1985). A History of Greek Philosophy (Vol. I. The earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Hegel, G. W. F. (1970). Philosophy of Nature (Vol. 1). London: Humanities Press.
  16. Hegel, G. W. F. (2010). The Science of Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Iliénkov, E. V. (2009). La dialéctica antigua como forma de pensamiento. Las Villas: Centro de Documentación e Información Científico Técnica Universidad Central "Marta Abreu".
  18. Iliénkov, E. V. (2017). La dialéctica de lo abstracto y lo concreto en "El Capital" de Marx. Quito: Edithor.
  19. Ilyenkov, E. V. (2009). The Ideal in Human Activity. Pacifica, CA: Marxists Internet Archive.
  20. Ilyenkov, E. V. (2018). Intelligent Materialism. Essays on Hegel and Dialectics (E. V. Pavlov Ed.). Leiden: Brill.
  21. Jung, C. G. (1988). Man and his Symbols. New York: Anchor Press.
  22. Kolakowski, L. (1978). Main Currents of Marxism (Vol. I. The Founders). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  23. Kuznetsov, B. G. (1971). The Dialectics of Nature and Dialectics in Capital. Soviet Studies in Philosophy, 10(1), 43-62.
  24. Laycock, H. (1979). Theories of Matter. In F. J. Pelletier (Ed.), Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems (pp. 89-120). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  25. Lenin, V. I. (1976). Collected Works (Vol. 38. Philosophical Notebooks). Moscow: Progress.
  26. Lewontin, R., & Levins, R. (2009). The Dialectical Biologist. Delhi: Aakar Books.
  27. Locke, J. (2005). Ensayo sobre el entendimiento humano. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  28. Long, A. A. (2006). Evolution vs. Intelligent Design in Classical Antiquity. Townsend Center Newsletter(November/December), 3-5.
  29. Long, A. A., & Sedley, D. N. (1987). The Hellenistic philosophers (Vol. 1. Translations of the principal sources with philosophical commentary). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Lukács, G. (1971). History and Class Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  31. Lukács, G. (1978). Ontology of the Social Being (Vol. 1. Hegel's false and his Genuine Ontology). London: Merlin Press.
  32. Marx, K. (2010). Collected Works (Vol. 35. Karl Marx - Capital Volume I). London: Lawrence & Wishart.
  33. Piedra Arencibia, R. (2018). El papel del trabajo en el desarrollo del pensamiento humano. Hybris, 9(2), 173-206.
  34. Piedra Arencibia, R. (2019). Marxismo y dialéctica de la naturaleza [Marxism and Dialectics of Nature] (2 ed.). Quito: Edithor.
  35. Piedra Arencibia, R. (2021). Ilyenkov’s Dialectics of the Ideal and Engels’s Dialectics of Nature: On Ilyenkov’s Supposed Affinity with Western Marxism. Historical Materialism, 29(2), 1–34.
  36. Quine, W. V. O. (2013). Word and Object. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  37. Sartre, J.-P. (1976). Dialectics and Science. Man and World, 9(1), 60-74.
  38. Sartre, J.-P. (2004). Critique of Dialectical Reason (Vol. 1. Theory of Practical Ensembles). Verso: London.
  39. Schmidt, A. (1971 ). The Concept of Nature in Marx. London: NLB.
  40. Sedley, D. N. (1985). The Stoic theory of universals. The Southern Journal of Philosophy of the Social Sciences(23), 87-92.
  41. Sellars, J. (2011). Stoic Ontology and Plato's Sophist. Bulletin of the Insititute of Classical Studies(54), 185-203.
  42. Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). Tool and Sign in the Development of the Child. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), Collected Works (Vol. 6: Scientific Legacy, pp. 3–70). New York: Plenum Publishers.
  43. Zeyl, D., & Sattler, B. (2019). Plato’s Timaeus. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/plato-timaeus/

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.