Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Image and identity in the virtual dimension of the world: a postphenomenological approach.

dialektika volumen 4, número 9

Abstract

In this paper, we will start from the question about how human identity processes occur to photographic images shared in the virtual environment, specifically on social networks. Our approach will be postphenomenological. Our proposals are: (i) the photographic images shared on social networks are one of the links that intertwine the Virtual Dimension of the World (VDW) with the Earthly Dimension of the World (EDW); (ii) for the same reason, human existence is not restricted to one or the other, but both of them are in the plurality and multiplicity of existing and being alive; (iii) the photographic images shared in virtuality are part of an identity process, destined to be shown to others; (iv) VDW has, as one of its fundamental characteristics, the constant possibility of experiencing existence from an accelerated, aesthetic and poeticized perception. We will also point out, along with these proposals, how this phenomenon modifies the ways in which we perceive, know and understand the world of life. In conclusion, we propose to understand the DVM and the DTM not as two realities that exclude each other, thinking the other as false, but as two dimensions of the same world; each with its own characteristics, but always part of the same world. Technology, and what it provides, is an extension of human capacity that broadens understanding and analysis of the world's material.

Keywords

postphenomenology, identity, photography, Virtual Dimension of the World (VDW), Earthly Dimension of the World (EDW)

PDF (Spanish) HTML (Spanish)

References

  1. Aristóteles (2018) Física, Gredos.
  2. Aydin, C., González Woge, M., and Verbeek, P.-P. (2019). “Technological environmentality: conceptualizing technology as a mediating milieu”. Philos. Technol. 32, 321–338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0309-3
  3. Barthes, R. (1989). La cámara lúcida. Notas sobre la fotografía. Barcelona: Paidós.
  4. Benjamin, W. (1973). La obra de arte en la época de su reproductibilidad técnica, Taurus.
  5. Caers, R. (2013), “Facebook: a Literature Review”, New Media & Society, 15, 982-1002.
  6. Cianca, E. & Gavilanes, E. (2018), “Voces y expresiones del argot juvenil madrileño actual”, Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la comunicación, 74, p.p. 147-168.
  7. Crandall (2011) “An actor of the Street: Events, Agencies, and Gatherings”, SUBSTANCE, 40 (3):49-66.
  8. Ferrando, F. (2019). Philosophical Posthumanism, Bloomsbury Academic.
  9. Gibson, J. J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hills-dale, NJ: Lawrence.
  10. Giddens, A. (1995), Modernidad e identidad del Yo, Península.
  11. Gómez Zúñiga, R., González Mina, J., Rueda Ortíz, R., y Comps, V. (2016), Facebook como obra mundana. Poetizar la vida y recrear vínculos personales, Editorial Universidad del Valle.
  12. Groys, B. (2016) Arte en flujo. Buenos Aires: Caja negra.
  13. Hauser, S., Oogjes, D., Wakkary, R., and Verbeek, P.-P. (2018). “An annotated portfolio on doing postphenomenology through research products,” in Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (New York, NY), 459–471.
  14. Hayles, K. (1999). How we became posthuman. Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature and informatics, The University of Chicago Press.
  15. Heidegger, M. (2009), Ser y Tiempo. Madrid: Trotta.
  16. Horney, K. (1991). Neurosis and human growth the struggle towards self-realization, W. W. Norton & Company.
  17. Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  18. Ihde, D. (1995). Postphenomenology: Essays in the postmodern context. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  19. Ihde, D. (2002). Bodies in Technology. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  20. Ihde, D. (2003). Postphenomenology - Again? Available online at: https://bit.ly/3Hcd4vB
  21. Ihde, D. (2012). Experimental Phenomenology, 2nd Edn. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  22. Introna, L. (2017). “Phenomenological approaches to ethics and information technology,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Metaphysics Research Lab.
  23. Lanier, J. (2017). Dawn of the New Everything: EncountersWith Reality and Virtual
  24. Naji, J. (2018). “The posthuman poetics of Instagram Poetry”, en The Posthuman Poetics of Instagram Poetry – ScienceOpen. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3KM2X2T
  25. Navarrete, J. (2004). “Sobre la investigación cualitativa, nuevos conceptos”, Investigaciones sociales Año VIII N° 13, pp. 277-299.
  26. Navarrete, J. (2015) Modernidad y conocimiento social. La emergencia de un discurso epistémico en América Latina Cinta moebio 54: 290-301.
  27. O’Brolcháin, F., Jacquemard, T., Monaghan, D., O’Connor, N., Novitzky, P., and Gordijn, B. (2016). The convergence of virtual reality and social networks: threats to privacy and autonomy. Sci. Eng. Ethics 22, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9621-1
  28. Pérez Díaz, A. (2013) Formas de re-creación de la experiencia vital de una ‘adulta mayor’ a través de la red social Facebook: el caso de Martine Beaussillon. trabajo de grado disponible en: https://bit.ly/33OCHnX
  29. Pérez Morales, A. (2021) “Mal y (tecno)barbarie ahora”, PARÁLISIS, Vol. I
  30. Reality, Henry Holt and Co., Inc.
  31. Rueda, R., & Giraldo, D. (2016). “La imagen de perfil en Facebook: identidad y representación en esta red social”, Revista Folios, (43), pp.119-135.
  32. Rueda, R., y Giraldo, D. (2014). Profile image: ways of self(re)presentation on the Facebook social network. En B. Saegret (Ed.), Youth 2.0: Connecting, Sharing and Empowering. University of Antwerpen, Bélgica, Springer (en prensa).
  33. Sennet, R. (2009). El artesano. Barcelona: Anagrama.
  34. Sontag, S. (2005). Sobre la fotografía. Barcelona: Anagrama.
  35. Stiegler, B. (1994). La thécnique et le temps (T.I). Francia: Galilée.
  36. Tognato, C. (2019). “La imagen de perfil en Facebook: identidad y representación en esta red social”, Revista Universitas Humanística, Vol. 11, pp.45-51.
  37. Verbeek, P.-P. (2015). “Designing the public sphere: information technologies and the politics of mediation,” in The Onlife Manifesto, ed L. Floridi (Cham: Springer International Publishing), pp.217–227.
  38. Voordijk, H. & Vahdatikhaki, F, (2020): “Virtual Reality learning environments and technological mediation in construction practice”, European Journal of Engineering Education, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1795085

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.